Thank you both, excellent suggestions here… Some of it are characters I didn’t know but I’ll still take it, because they are easy to visualize and if I have to read some old argentinian comics to get my PAO complete I’ll do it (it’s even good practice for spanish reading, so two birds with one stone) ![]()
Are you still looking for only people?
Yes, for now, because the People are the part of PAO I’m really using all the time, so I figure it’s giving me the most reward for my efforts.
I do write down Objects in my big Excel masterlist, when a good idea comes to mind but I’m not actively trying to complete that column.
One problem is that I’m having a lot of similar objects to differentiate (which is not a problem in itself, just would need to be really careful and would take a lot of time to review the 1000 objects list to make sure I don’t have “twins”)
So I’m thinking I could use only one keyword for each number and associate both element with it. For example, 125 “lionness” Person = Alanna the lioness, Object = a female lion / lioness statuette/plushie/ whatever lioness-shaped object. Or 149 “Lagaffe” Person = Gaston Lagaffe, Object = Le gaffophone. 148 “lockpick” Person=thief, Object = the lockpick itself (tools)
The problem would be to be careful that the person can be used without their object. Like if I have “the lockpick” (148 thief) rummaging through a piece of stolen luggage (146) = 148-146, it should be very clear that he’s not using the lockpicks (tool) to open it, because then it would be 148-148. So I’m not sure if it’s a good idea or not…






































