Is Photoreading real or fake ? If it does work, how can i get into it (without money)???
There are ways to increase reading speed, but according to NASA’s research [PDF], “there is no benefit to using the PhotoReading technique”.
There is more discussion on the photoreading mental photography, photoreading, mental photography video, and zox pro threads, as well as the speed reading page.
2 Likes
What about the one used by RamĂłn Campayo ? He reads about 1200 words/min.
He calls it " Fotolectura" but it doesn’t seem to be the same thing that Paul Scheele teachs in his book.
Ramón talks about some kinda “mental video” in his book (which I haven’t finished yet) but in Campayo’s method you really have to read the book instead of “Photoread” it.
1 Like
I’m not sure, but someone here may know.
Sorry, but you you are a little mistaken at this place. Ramon’s reading speed of as much as 2500 words per minute. But we should distinguish between Campayo and Paul Shelley. The last quack in all meanings of the word. He believes that in our subconscious mind there is some kind of super powerful computer that will replace the frontal lobes. These are completely unscientific arguments. While Ramon Campayo offers a really effective speed reading technique, which is fundamentally not very different from Howard Berg’s technique. Ramon called this method photo-reading because it offers to turn reading into silent viewing of videos. It is entirely based on visual thinking. So, to read: “Canarca runs in a cage,” I just have to look at this sentence and visualize the situation without saying the words separately. All speed reading techniques are based on the same principle. But I repeat. Ramon’s photoreader has nothing to do with Paul Shelley’s photoreader. The effectiveness of the Ramon method is scientifically proven, because it involves the reading of hippocampi in the process. Now I myself am working on reading that way. And I advise you too.
2 Likes