In working with my first medical data from @vanCeos, I tried a different method of working with a decimal point in a string of numbers that is both consistent, helps ordering, and reduces system complexity. In 2016, @josh mentioned that

His example was

1.008 – candle (1), pebble (.), sofa (008)

I thought that was a very workable solution but I wasn’t confident that my visual images could keep track of the position of the pebble. Did the pebble come first or second?

My rules for using a Major encoded 2-digit number peg system are to start on the left taking two digits at a time, encode the decimal point as a P (remove any P words from the 9 encoding, leaving only the B), and if there is a leftover, visualize it with a 1-digit number peg.

So this would become:

1.008 - tape (1.), seesaw (00), ivy (8)

Let me know what you think about this.