I agree; the reason I proposed a PAO system with man and female translations is because the PAO system is sort of the standard way to do things. I wanted to avoid a discussion about PAO vs PA or PO systems, instead of a discussion about whether adding the male/female distinction would be an improvement.
Coming up with 2000 people should be as easy as coming up with 1000 people and 1000 objects. Especially since a lot of names have male/female version (Petrus, Petra).
In my system that doesn’t really apply. For example 10, 22, 34, 54, 93, 88 would translate as yo, nan, mak, sak, gam, faf. I have developed a meaning for each of those one syllable words, but I never connect them to the name of a person directly.
As a result of all kinds of experimentations I now have 100 actions like:
00 = O (think of o-ring) = ring juggling
07 = ot (sounds like odd, so strange) = running in a hamster wheel
12 = in (like in the goal) = kicking a football
78 = taf ( sounds like tough) = dips with heavy weights (you need to be tough to do that)
For most actions I have a person that is performing it. However some are anonymous people like a baseball player for throwing, catching and batting and gymnast Yuri Keki (he was at the top of his career when in my country gymnastics was a big thing on television and there was no internet) doing a multitude of gymnastics movements.

So I was thinking of perhaps using both female and male persons for interacting in a more or less predetermined way with the action (performed by the original performer) without doing the action themselves. If this method works at high speed it should also work for the long run. So I can for example connect Michael Jackson to a ring gymnast act by making him applaud at the side. And for the female person I can simply choose Janet Jackson or Diana Ross.

Adding a male person to a female person or vice versa would be relatively easy I imagine.




update:
I have completed my 100 male persons, female persons and actions list. I can’t imagine that I could also do this for 1.000 numbers at all. Based on a small experiment I am concluding that perhaps the male person performing the action and the female interacting with the male person is the best way to go, but we will see.