Male person action object, female person action object

In my response to Some thoughts on using “modifiers” to expand a 2-digit system to a 3-digit one I used the idea of diversifying by means of using male and female persons as separate categories. So this gives the opportunity to also extend your PAO system by finding a partner of the opposite gender for every person. And thus we can put both a male and female PAO in the same location (12 digits per location for a 2 digit PAO system) without confusion about order.

I don’t think I am the first person to think of this, so if someone has already thought of this, please let me know.

2 Likes

I think this idea has potential in a PAP system. Actions and how they play out can be chosen with more liberty. The two people does the action together with no need to think about who is starting the event or doing the action towards the other.

Comming up with 2000 people should be as easy as comming up with 1000 people and 1000 objects. Especially since alot of names have male/female verions (Petrus, Petra).

1 Like

I agree; the reason I proposed a PAO system with man and female translations is because the PAO system is sort of the standard way to do things. I wanted to avoid a discussion about PAO vs PA or PO systems, instead of a discussion about whether adding the male/female distinction would be an improvement.

Coming up with 2000 people should be as easy as coming up with 1000 people and 1000 objects. Especially since a lot of names have male/female version (Petrus, Petra).

In my system that doesn’t really apply. For example 10, 22, 34, 54, 93, 88 would translate as yo, nan, mak, sak, gam, faf. I have developed a meaning for each of those one syllable words, but I never connect them to the name of a person directly.

As a result of all kinds of experimentations I now have 100 actions like:

00 = O (think of o-ring) = ring juggling

07 = ot (sounds like odd, so strange) = running in a hamster wheel

12 = in (like in the goal) = kicking a football

78 = taf ( sounds like tough) = dips with heavy weights (you need to be tough to do that)

For most actions I have a person that is performing it. However some are anonymous people like a baseball player for throwing, catching and batting and gymnast Yuri Keki (he was at the top of his career when in my country gymnastics was a big thing on television and there was no internet) doing a multitude of gymnastics movements.

image

So I was thinking of perhaps using both female and male persons for interacting in a more or less predetermined way with the action (performed by the original performer) without doing the action themselves. If this method works at high speed it should also work for the long run. So I can for example connect Michael Jackson to a ring gymnast act by making him applaud at the side. And for the female person I can simply choose Janet Jackson or Diana Ross.

image

Adding a male person to a female person or vice versa would be relatively easy I imagine.

image

image

image

image

update:

I have completed my 100 male persons, female persons and actions list. I can’t imagine that I could also do this for 1.000 numbers at all. Based on a small experiment I am concluding that perhaps the male person performing the action and the female interacting with the male person is the best way to go, but we will see.

1 Like