Instersecting Category System

Heyy, so I’d like to share the system which I used to create my PAO :blush: (Well, the persons :sweat_smile:) Being on the forum has given me a bunch of inspiration, so I thought I’d write this up in case it might inspire someone else :slight_smile:

(This is quite a long post. Sections not strictly relevant to explain the system at its core are hidden – if you are interested, feel free to read them :grin:)

Backstory

click to expand

After having read Moonwalking with Einstein (hi, yes, me too!), Memory Craft by Lynne, the Free Ebook from here as well as multiple posts on the forum and after having dabbled with a few memory experiments here and there…well, the time finally came. Finally I crumpled my fear of the seemingly overwhelming task of creating my own PAO and decided to go for it! I wanted to convert all the numbers from 0-9 and 00-99 to images and tried to think which would be the best way to do so for me personally. I knew that I wanted:

  • my system to be based on characters (I was quite fond of them – after all, how could I not after having read Memory Craft)
  • my system to be designed in such a way that for each number I’d have a strong suggestion for which character to pick

I liked the Dominic System because it was person based – but I didn’t like the approach of arriving at people through initials (personal preference). Also, on the forum I sometimes bumped into posts, where people wouldn’t quite know which image to choose for a particular number and asked for ideas (I think this was for Major as well as Dominic based systems). Which is fine, but I kind of wanted something which wouldn’t get me easily stumped by a number – for me, I preferred more structure.

Hehe, and well, after some thinking my answer to that was the Intersecting Category System :sunglasses:

Explaining the System

So for my system I picked a category for sets of numbers: 0-9, 00-09, 10-19, 20-29, 30-39,… But also I picked a category for each digit from 0-9. So each number from 00-99 would belong to not one, but two categories – if you’d show that in a table, they would intersect – thereby giving me a pretty good guide on what character to choose for any particular number.

For the sets of numbers the individual categories were all either a show or a movie I liked:

  • 0-9 Avatar the Last Airbender
  • 00-09 Atlantis: The Lost Empire
  • 10-19 Brave (the Disney/Pixar one)
  • 20-29 Spirited Away
  • 30-39 Monsters, Inc.
  • 40-49 Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005)
  • 50-59 The Boy and the Beast
  • 60-69 Alice in Wonderland (2010)
  • 70-79 Encanto
  • 80-89 The Owl House
  • 90-99 Coraline

For the category of the digits between 0-9 I chose tropes/archetypes/functions of characters in a story:

  • 0 Animal
  • 1 Goofy Character
  • 2 Side Villian
  • 3 Strong Character
  • 4 Helping Character
  • 5 Doofus Character
  • 6 Main Villain
  • 7 Wise Character
  • 8 Special Power Character (basically a joker for me personally, I could assign any character there which was hard to fit anywhere else, or a character I wanted to be in my system)
  • 9 Main Protagonist

So basically the tens place of a number is connected to a movie/show and the ones places is connected to a funtion of a character in a story.

A concrete example:
66
6 in the tens place means Alice in Wonderland
6 in the ones places means Main Villan
the main villan in Alice in Wonderland is the Red Queen
66 = Red Queen

Not Always Straight Forward

click to expand

So, obviously I picked a really nice and tidy example above – but no, even with this system it’s not always straight forward as of what character to use. For example: 0 in the ones place is supposed to be an animal, but there are shows/movies without any notable animals or shows/movies with a lot of animals as characters. Atlantis: The Lost Empire didn’t have any notable animals, so I chose the character Mole for 00 (he is human but kinda acts like a mole :sweat_smile:). Alice in Wonderland has the reverse problem: Many characters are actually animals. So for 60 I chose the White Rabbit, although I also have animals for 62 (Cheshire Cat), 63 (Dormouse) and 67 (Absolem). Also, Cheshire Cat isn’t an actual Side Villain (which is my category for 2) nor is the Dormouse very buff (3 are Stong Characters).

However, I didn’t make this system so I could follow it to a T – I made it to give me pretty solid suggestions on which character to choose for any given number. So in any ambiguous case, I just went with my first instinct or what seemed to fit best and then used imagination to justify it. So the Dormouse seems to be quite the fighter and tough despite its size; Cheshire may not be a proper Side Villain, but hey, shady enough. One more fun example: George Sanderson is my 37 (my Wise Character for Monsters, Inc.). For me personally, that movie didn’t have your token sage character, one who offers wisdom to the protagonists. However, I mean, George Sanderson was the poor soul who got a kid’s sock stuck on his fur and got shaved bare as a result soon after, so…there must be some sort of wisdom related to that now, right? Anyway, it’s pretty funny coming up with reasons for why an unlikely character does fit this one or other function – so I have no issue with the fact that this system isn’t always 100% straight forward after all :grin:

All my Persons in a Table

Here I put all the characters I chose for the persons in my PAO neatly arranged into a table. In the table you can see the intersections more clearly – also, if you feel like you want to try out the system, feel free to use it as a template :blush:

Strengths & Weaknesses

click to expand

I think the biggest strength of this system is how it gives you a guide and really helps you to choose images – this is also extremely helpful for recall during the learning phase! I had the system learned extremely quickly, as for each number I had two cues to help me remember which exact character I chose. Mind you, to get automatic it still takes so much practice and drills – so I don’t mean that. I mean that I didn’t need to look at my notes for very long to know which number meant which character – I just thought about the respective categories and already I had it, or at the very least had only a few options of which one it could be. (Yes, you do need to first remember which category responds to the tens and the ones. An aid I used for that is elaborated on in the last section.)

Its weakness is what causes its strength, however: Yeah it gives lots of structure, but that can be limiting. In a regular category system you have a category for specific sets of numbers, but within those you are completely free. This intersecting system is a bit constraining in a way. So it all depends on what you want!

Conclusion

So. Of all the possible ways to convert numbers into images, this is one way. It was my way. It does not have to be yours, if it doesn’t seem like the right fit. If you do consider using it – feel free to adapt it as much as you like, or just use it as an inspiration to come up with your own system.

If you have any questions, comments or thoughts to add – feel free to share :grin:

Here are two more sections as an add-on for those interested:

Using This System Yourself

click to expand

Just a few notes in case you want to use this system yourself:

  • You don’t have to stick with movies/shows as categories for the tens place. You can literally throw anything in there and mix it up: celebreties, sports stars, Pokémon, game characters, people you know… However, you do then need to find 10 things that can connect to all of these categories. For example, if you choose the categories sports stars, celebrities and Pokémon (among others) for the tens place, and you choose “tall” as a category for the ones places, then you’ll need to have one tall sports star, one tall celebrity and one tall Pokémon. So you can literally pick anything as long as you can make that intersection happen (which you can aid by being imaginative :wink:).
  • A few more ideas for categories to use for the ones place: attributes like black hair, tall, bulky, annoying, loud, a character you dislike, favourite character, bearded, small, green, animal-like, animal, human, fantasy creature, snobbish… Sort of something tied to how something is or a function that it fullfills.
  • Also! Yep, I based my system on characters. Does this necessarily have to be the case? Nope. You can also choose objects for it: Just have different categories of objects for the tens and different attributes of these objects for the ones (like big, bulky, small, usefull, useless, furry, cute,…). Whatever floats your boat. It’s an intersecting category system as soon as you have two categories which, well, intersect. Doesn’t have to include characters.

Associating the Digit with the Category

click to expand

Okay, this is a thing I think many people do to learn their images: associating the image with the number. I also did that with the categories and the tens and ones places, which really really helped me to memorize them quickly.

I mostly used an approach I myself call “The Reverse Shaper System” – but actually is just associating exclusively by shape and is nothing new or fancy.

So here are my associations (most are shape based, but not all):

For the number set from 0-9/the tens place:

  • 0-9 Avatar the Last Airbender because it’s my favourite show ever, so obviously it comes very first before anything else :grin:
  • 00-09 Atlantis: The Lost Empire because 0 flipped to the side is like a submarine
  • 10-19 Brave because 1 is like an arrow Merida shoots
  • 20-29 Spirited Away because 2 looks like Haku in dragon form
  • 30-39 Monsters, Inc. because 3 is fluffy like the fur of Sulley
  • 40-49 Charlie and the Chocolate Factory because 4 reminds me of the shape of a chocolate bar
  • 50-59 The Boy and the Beast because in the movie two characters squat at one point and it kinda looked like the shape of a 5
  • 60-69 Alice in Wonderland because Alice can be imagined to make the shape of a 6 as she tumbles down the rabbit hole
  • 70-79 Encanto because 7 is like the tower of the house Casita
  • 80-89 The Owl House because our trusty Hooty can twist into crazy shapes…like 8
  • 90-99 Coraline because 9 can be like a button with string dangling from it

For the digits 0-9 in the ones place

  • 0 Animal because 0 reminds me of Appa from the Last Airbender and he is an animal
  • 1 Goofy Character because 1 looks like the top of a jester’s hat
  • 2 Side Villan because 2 looks bent over like villains do when they scheme and chuckle evilly
  • 3 Strong Character because, well…shape of muscular biceps
  • 4 Helping Character because 4 looks like a chair in an ambulance, and an ambulance is super helpful
  • 5 Doofus Character because when you slap your face real hard you’ve got a mark of five fingers on it and it kinda looks like a 5
  • 6 Main Villain because the belly of 6 can be an eye and the tail the evil downwards sloping eyebrow
  • 7 Wise Character because 7 can be a cup of tea but also 7 just already seems fitting for a wise character
  • 8 Special Power Character because 8 kinda looks special already
  • 9 Main Character because it’s in the last spot and also because I first associated Aang (from Avatar the Last Airbender) with it as he is standing and slightly bending forwards – so he’s kinda a symbol for all the other protagonists

I practiced these associations a couple of times and they stuck pretty quickly! I actually went on to associate each number shape from 0-9 and 00-99 with the character as well, so 00 are the big googles of Mole, as a straight forward example. This I did just to be able to access the character even quicker by hiding a clue in the shape of the number.

9 Likes

This is a great system! It’s very similar to the one I first learned to memorize cards, where each suit was a category, and each value was sub-category, so you ended up with like “diamonds = very rich people” “king and queen = married couple” so king and queen of diamonds would be Jay-Z and Beyonce.

At first it takes some effort making those conversions to remember which group of 10 and which single digit is for which category, but it looks like you’ve thought that through pretty nicely. If you commit to building fluency with this system it will serve you very well!

1 Like

I enjoy the idea of people pushing the boundaries and creating novel systems to remember abstract concepts like playing cards and numbers. There is much merit to your system, as it has a definite structure to it. I’m not a great fan of movies so the chosen characters you have used wouldn’t exactly cut it for me but as we are all individuals with our own unique experiences and knowledge each ones system (although borrowing from your method) would be their own individual unique system. I dabbled a little with a similar idea to devise a system for playing cards that did as you have done that is, using categories. I will see if I can find the link to copy for you if you are interested in reading it. I hadn’t ‘christened’ the system I was experimenting with but fundamentally it worked very similar to the method that you have outlined here. Good luck with your system and if you are a competitor in memory competitions I believe your system should set you in good stead!

Above is one such link.

1 Like

(Note: I specifically wrote this before revealing/expanding your “Strengths & Weaknesses” section.) Regarding strengths from my perspective, this encoding system is brilliant for a number of reasons:

  • The specific choices are personal to you, which should make it much quicker learn (and I’m sure made it quicker to create)
  • Choosing movies with characters makes it easier to come up with the people
  • The tropes/archetypes/functions idea results in a high degree of internal consistency, which also makes it easier to learn
  • It is relatively generic, in which anyone with familiarity with stories (movies, series, books) and quickly and easily adapt it
  • You included a separate 0-9 and 00-09 so you don’t have to do hand waving to memorize the odd final digit
  • Lots of people go with some version of Major or Dominic or shape system for structure, but this is completely outside of that

A possible down side is that it would be hard to directly expand it to a 3-digit P encoding system, but that probably doesn’t matter if you are not interested in competition.

You have an excellent base to start with. Do you have any ideas for the “AO” parts of the system yet? I am guessing that will be quit a bit harder.

1 Like

Thanks so much for the positive feedback and the encouragement :blush:

Also thanks for sharing the system for cards – I haven’t heard of that one! It sounds interesting, especially how the king and queen are a pair and you kinda arrive at the individual two persons through that. I love how many different systems and approaches there are :sunglasses:

1 Like

Aw thanks for the positive comment, I appreciate it!

Yeah, fictional characters were the base of my system, but I don’t think they have to be. Real people and objects can be used just as well, I believe – I think you can use almost any category as long as you can make the intersections happen.

Thanks for sharing the link – I don’t think I’ve seen this particular thread yet! I also enjoy the fact that people keep coming up with new systems – it keeps it quite fresh and interesting :blush:

Thanks for your comment and for adding onto the strengths and weaknesses :blush:

I can second all the strengths you pointed out, yes! As well as the issue with expanding it to a 3-digit system – yeah :sweat_smile: Initially I thought it was completely unsuited to be expanded and that one would have to just continue with a regular category system, but after reading your post I actually had an idea!

Perhaps each set of hundreds could have their very own categories – like, digits in the tens and the ones place could have a different meaning. From 00-99 I had all movies/shows – so what if for say 100-199 I picked celebrities? For the tens I could have categories like singers, actors, authors, ect. and for the ones I could have attributes like tall, muscular, funny, the richest… So I would still use the intersecting system, but I’d change the content of it. Or I could just watch A LOT of movies and just stick with that :laughing:

But yeah, not sure how promising that above idea is – but if I ever do try it out and expand to a 3-digit system, I’ll be sure to post about it :grin:

Yes, actually! I have all my As and Os picked :sunglasses: However I did so quite recently, so I didn’t want to share them yet as they aren’t quite tested as much as my Ps. For me it was relatively easy to pick actions and objects, as many characters already had token actions/objects. Others didn’t but it was pretty easy to match them up with something – like for example the baby character I have (Boo) has a little plushie as an object and as an action kissing (in a cute baby way :sweat_smile:). For some characters I did have trouble though, so I just brainstormed actions/objects and out of that list assigned whatever seemed the most fitting. So it was okay, actually :blush:

1 Like

No matter the system, this is something you will always run into in my experience. And no matter the system, your training with it will be more important than the system you decide to use. You mights start our with “00 = Atlantis: The lost Empire & animal = Mole” but you have to get to “00 = Mole”. When you reach that, the system you used to get these is no longer of importance.

One major strength I found in these types of systems (my 2-digit PAO started very similar) was that it becomes easier to actually pick the characters you love. The structure is also clear to imagine beforehand what kind of characters you will end up with.

A weakness I found mainly when adopting this system for my millennium system is that not all categories allow for ten good characters. I often thought I had a good category only to find 8 or 9 persons there.

while difficult indeed, I think that any sort of limitation on a 3-digit system will make it difficult. I myself found it easier to find 1.000 persons with categories (without the trait limiter) than I would have with the major or dominic system.

This is pretty much how Flauwy back in the day (Link) and myself (Link) created a millennium system.

The attributes might prove to be less of a rule and more of a guideline in the larger systems. I took it a bit less strict myself and worked with number associations rather than traits. 282 is Sokka from The last airbender, because 200 is cartoons, 80 is the last airbender (8 looks like aang on the air orb), and 2 looks like a flying boomerang, so Sokka.

Be sure to try this a lot. Some token actions do not work well with other characters. An example I struggled with was flying for example, seeing the Hulk flying was memorable, but seeing Angel flying was not.

4 Likes