Universal Guide for Reviewing Memory Palaces

General Memory Chat
1

The text was fully translated from Portuguese into English with the help of artificial intelligence. I chose to publish it in the most commonly used language on the forum in order to increase its reach. I would like to note that the use of AI in the translation is due to my limited fluency in English. Below is the original version of the post:

https://forum.artofmemory.com/t/guia-universal-para-revisao-de-palacios-mentais/

—————

HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE

  1. Read Parts 1 and 2 first. They explain the reason behind everything.
  2. Then read Parts 3 and 4. They are the heart of the system.
  3. Apply Part 5 to your next mind palace.
  4. Use Parts 6, 7, and 8 in your daily life so that you never forget again.
  5. Go back to Parts 10 and 12 whenever you need a quick reminder.

—————

PART 1 – INTRODUCTION TO THE SYSTEM

This guide is a complete review system for mind palaces. It combines 11 techniques, 6 review modes, and a spaced repetition schedule that works in any palace, whether small, large, new, or old. The goal is simple: to lock in what you have stored and never lose it again.

WHAT IS A MIND PALACE (QUICK REVIEW)

A mind palace is a place you know well, a house, a street, a path, where you anchor vivid images to remember information. Each point along the path is a locus (plural: loci). At each locus, an image represents a piece of data, a concept, or a fact.

The palace works because the brain is very good at spatial memory. Remembering WHERE something is comes more naturally than remembering WHAT something is. But without review, even spatial memory decays. And poorly done review (rereading, going over things passively) barely locks anything in. This guide solves both problems: when to review and how to review.

—————

PART 2 – HOW MEMORY WORKS (THE USEFUL BASICS)

Before reviewing, it is good to understand three simple things about memory. These are what make the whole system work.

  1. THE FORGETTING CURVE

After you learn something, your memory begins to decay immediately. Without review, you lose about 50% within the first 24 hours and up to 90% within a week. This is the forgetting curve. But the curve has a weak spot: each time you review AT THE RIGHT MOMENT (when the memory is about to fade), it comes back stronger than before and takes LONGER to fade again. That is why the intervals in this guide’s schedule grow over time.

  1. THE POWER OF ACTIVE RECALL

Rereading something gives you the feeling that you know it, but that is an illusion. The brain confuses recognizing with remembering. The difference is huge: recognizing is seeing the answer and thinking “oh, I knew that”; remembering is pulling the answer from scratch, without any hint. Research shows that the act of PULLING the information on your own (active recall) strengthens memory much more than rereading the material, even if you get it wrong on the attempt. That is why in this guide you always CLOSE the material before reviewing.

  1. SPACED REPETITION

Reviewing 10 times in a row on the same day creates temporary fluency. It feels like you know it, but within 48 hours it has already faded. Reviewing those same 10 times spread out over weeks creates permanent memory. The reason: the brain only strengthens a neural connection when it is REACTIVATED after a period of near-forgetting. Reviewing too early does not create effort; reviewing too late leaves nothing to reactivate. The ideal point is right BEFORE forgetting, and that is exactly what this guide’s schedule calculates for you.

—————

PART 3 – 11 REVIEW TECHNIQUES

These are the techniques the system mixes. Each one serves a purpose. You do not need to use all of them at once. The system (Part 5) will tell you when to use each one. Here you learn what each one does.

  1. LINEAR REVIEW

Walk through the palace from beginning to end, in the correct order.

Used for the first review, quick review, and warm-up.
How to do it: start at locus 1 and go to the last one, without skipping. Pull the image before looking at the answer.

  1. REVERSE REVIEW

Walk through the palace from end to beginning.

Used to break the dependence on order and to reveal hidden gaps.
How to do it: start at the last locus and go back to the first. Pull each image on your own.

  1. BLOCK REVIEW

Divide the palace into chunks (for example, in groups of 5 loci) and review block by block.

Used for large palaces, when you have little time, and for deep locking-in.
How to do it: choose a block. Review it linearly. Then in reverse. Only then move on to the next block.

  1. STEPWISE REVIEW

Gradually increase the size of what you review (1 locus, 2, 3, 5, 10…).

Used to build confidence, warm up a weak memory, and for new palaces.
How to do it: review locus 1. Then 1-2. Then 1-2-3. Keep growing until the whole palace.

  1. JUMP REVIEW

Skip through the loci in random order.

Used to test whether the memory is truly strong and to break the “dance” of the loci.
How to do it: draw or choose loci out of order (e.g., 7, 2, 15, 4). Pull the image of each one.

  1. WEAK POINTS REVIEW

Focus only on the loci where you got stuck or forgot.

Used for maximum efficiency, when time is short.
How to do it: mark the difficult loci. Review ONLY them several times. Then test the whole palace.

  1. SPACED REPETITION

Review at growing intervals: 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 15 days, 30 days…

Used to truly lock things in, for long-term memory.
How to do it: follow the schedule in Part 6. Always review on the marked day, even if you think you remember.

  1. ACTIVE RECALL

Close the material and force your memory to pull the information on its own.

Used to lock things in like no other technique. It is the most powerful.
How to do it: cover the palace. Say out loud what is at each locus. Only then check.

  1. ASSOCIATION REVIEW

Reinforce the links between one locus and the next.

Used to avoid losing the sequence and to prevent gaps.
How to do it: at each locus, ask “what comes next?” before moving on to the next one.

  1. CONTRAST REVIEW

Compare similar loci that you tend to mix up.

Used to end confusions (e.g., two similar loci, two similar images).
How to do it: place the confusing loci side by side. Increase the difference between the images (color, sound, movement).

  1. EMOTIONAL/VISUAL REINFORCEMENT REVIEW

Make the images stronger, more exaggerated, more ridiculous, or more emotional.

Used for images that have become pale or are fading.
How to do it: redo the image bigger, more colorful, funnier, more disgusting, and louder.

Part 4 explains in what order to use these techniques.

—————

PART 4 – 6 REVIEW MODES

The system divides reviews into 6 modes. Each mode uses a combination of the techniques from Part 3 and serves a specific situation. This is what makes the system fast, efficient, and universal.

  1. QUICK Review: Use when you have little time (2 to 5 minutes). Reinforce the core.

  2. MEDIUM Review: Use when you have moderate time (10 to 20 minutes). Reinforce the links.

  3. DEEP Review: Use when you have time (30+ min). Lock in image by image.

  4. RETENTION Review: Done on the days marked by the schedule in Part 6.

  5. EMERGENCY Review: You went blank and need to remember as fast as possible.

  6. MAINTENANCE Review: Use when you already know it well. You just want it to stay solid for months and years.

MODE 1 – QUICK REVIEW (2 to 5 min)

Goal: refresh the whole palace in the shortest time possible.

Step by step:

  1. Close your eyes or look at a fixed point.
  2. Walk through the palace LINEARLY from beginning to end (Technique 1).
  3. Move quickly through each locus, only pulling the main image.
  4. If you get stuck, DO NOT stop. Mark it mentally and keep going.
  5. At the end, go back only to the loci where you got stuck (Technique 6).

Uses techniques: 1 (Linear) + 6 (Weak Points) + 8 (Active Recall)

Ideal before a test, presentation, or meeting.
Ideal for waking up early and warming up your memory for the day.

MODE 2 – MEDIUM REVIEW (10 to 20 min)

Goal: reinforce the links and prevent gaps from appearing.

Step by step:

  1. Do a complete LINEAR pass (Technique 1).
  2. Do a complete REVERSE pass (Technique 2).
  3. Do a JUMP pass with 5 to 10 random loci (Technique 5).
  4. Reinforce the LINKS between the loci: “after X comes Y” (Technique 9).
  5. Write down the loci where you got stuck and review only them (Technique 6).

Uses techniques: 1 + 2 + 5 + 6 + 8 + 9

Standard mode for daily use.
Recommended once a day during the first 3 days of a new palace.

MODE 3 – DEEP REVIEW (30+ min)

Goal: lock in each image at the strongest possible level.

Step by step:

  1. Divide the palace into BLOCKS of 5 loci (Technique 3).
  2. In each block, do: linear, reverse, jump, and active recall.
  3. At each locus, REINFORCE the image: more color, sound, smell, movement (Technique 11).
  4. Compare similar loci and increase the contrast (Technique 10).
  5. At the end, do the whole palace in one go, without stopping (Technique 1).
  6. Then do the whole palace in JUMP mode (Technique 5).

Uses techniques: 1 + 2 + 3 + 5 + 8 + 10 + 11

Ideal during the first week of an important palace.
Ideal when the palace has started to “get scrambled.”

MODE 4 – LONG-TERM RETENTION REVIEW

Goal: make the palace last for weeks, months, and years.

Step by step:

  1. Follow the schedule in Part 6 (spaced repetition).
  2. At each scheduled review, do a MEDIUM Review (Mode 2).
  3. If it was too easy, increase the interval for the next review.
  4. If you got stuck a lot, do a DEEP Review (Mode 3) and restart the interval.

Uses techniques: 7 (Spaced) + everything from Mode 2

This is the mode that guarantees long-term retention.
Without this mode, every palace ends up fading.

MODE 5 – EMERGENCY REVIEW (YOU WENT BLANK)

Goal: recover the memory RIGHT NOW, in the middle of the test or presentation.

Step by step:

  1. Take 3 deep breaths. Anxiety wipes out the palace; oxygen helps.
  2. DO NOT try to remember the locus where you got stuck. Go back 2 loci BEFORE it.
  3. Walk from the beginning of the previous block to the lost locus, SLOWLY.
  4. If it does not come, jump to the NEXT locus and keep going. Come back at the end.
  5. Use association: “what came after X?” (Technique 9).
  6. If nothing comes, go to another palace or another block and come back 1 min later.

Uses techniques: 4 (Stepwise) + 9 (Association) + 8 (Active Recall)

NEVER stay stuck at the locus where you got blocked. That locks you up even more.
The information is almost never what is forgotten. It is the ROUTE to it.
Going back a little bit almost always fixes it.

MODE 6 – MAINTENANCE REVIEW

Goal: keep a palace solid for MONTHS or YEARS with very little effort.

Step by step:

  1. Choose 1 day per month (e.g., every 1st of the month).
  2. On that day, do a MEDIUM Review (Mode 2).
  3. If it ran in under 5 minutes and without errors: next month.
  4. If you got stuck on something: do Mode 3 the next day and go back to the monthly rhythm.

Uses techniques: 7 (Spaced) + full Mode 2

10 to 15 minutes per MONTH keeps a whole palace alive.
It is the cheapest cost for long-term memory that exists.

—————

PART 5 – UNIVERSAL SYSTEM

Here is the complete system, from the day you FINISH building a palace until it is solid forever. This is the heart of this guide.

SYSTEM OVERVIEW (3 PHASES)

Phase 1 - Initial locking-in: You use deep reviews to (days 1 to 3) record. High frequency, medium/long sessions.

Phase 2 - Consolidation: You use medium reviews at (days 4 to 30) growing intervals. Spaced repetition in action.

Phase 3 - Maintenance: You use quick reviews at (from day 31 onward) long intervals. It costs almost nothing and lasts a long time.

PHASE 1 – INITIAL LOCKING-IN (DAYS 1, 2, AND 3)

Day 0 – Right after building the palace:

  1. Slow linear: Do the FIRST slow Linear pass (Technique 1).
  2. Reverse: Do the second Reverse pass (Technique 2).
  3. Blocks: Do the third pass in Blocks of 5 (Technique 3).
  4. Active recall: Close everything and do ACTIVE RECALL of the whole palace (Technique 8).
  5. Reinforce the weak ones: Mark the weak loci and reinforce only them (Technique 6 + 11).

Day 1 – 24 hours later:

  • Do 1 MEDIUM Review (Mode 2) in the morning.
  • Do 1 QUICK Review (Mode 1) before going to sleep.

Day 2:

  • Do 1 MEDIUM Review (Mode 2).
  • If you got stuck on several loci, add 1 DEEP Review on the weak blocks.

Day 3:

  • Do 1 MEDIUM Review (Mode 2), but starting with the REVERSE.
  • Finish with 1 JUMP round with 10 random loci.

PHASE 1 GOAL
By the end of day 3, you can: run the whole palace in order, in reverse, and by jumps, without consulting anything, with at most 1 or 2 stumbles. If you cannot do it yet, repeat day 2 and day 3 before moving on to Phase 2.

PHASE 2 – CONSOLIDATION (DAYS 4 TO 30)

In this phase you use spaced repetition. The days below are counted from the day you finished building the palace (Day 0).

Day 4: MEDIUM Review (Mode 2)
Day 6: QUICK Review (Mode 1)
Day 9: MEDIUM Review (Mode 2)
Day 14: MEDIUM Review + Jump (Mode 2 with focus on Technique 5)
Day 21: QUICK Review (Mode 1)
Day 30: FULL MEDIUM Review + total Active Recall (Technique 8)

HOW TO ADJUST THE INTERVAL

If the day’s review was EASY (no errors, less than 5 min): you can increase the next interval by 50%.

If the review was MEDIUM (1 or 2 errors): keep the schedule as it is.

If it was HARD (3+ errors or many stumbles): cut the next interval in half and do Mode 3 tomorrow.

PHASE 3 – MAINTENANCE (FROM DAY 31 ONWARD)

Day 45: QUICK Review (Mode 1)
Day 60: MEDIUM Review (Mode 2)
Day 90: MEDIUM Review + Jump
Day 120: QUICK Review (Mode 1)
Day 180: MEDIUM Review (Mode 2)

After that, 1 MEDIUM Review every 1 or 2 months (Mode 6 – Maintenance).

A TRUTH ALMOST NO ONE TELLS
After Phase 3, a well-built palace needs 10 to 15 minutes PER MONTH to stay alive. It is a very low cost for the benefit. Never abandon this maintenance. It is what separates those who remember for years from those who forget in weeks.

—————

PART 6 – SPACED REPETITION SCHEDULE

Here is the whole schedule in a single table, for you to print or copy. It is the same as in Part 5, but in a quick reference format. It works for any mind palace.

MASTER TABLE

Day 0: Building + initial locking-in (Mode 3)
Day 1: MEDIUM Review in the morning + QUICK at night
Day 2: MEDIUM Review (Mode 2)
Day 3: MEDIUM Review starting with the Reverse + Jump at the end
Day 4: MEDIUM Review (Mode 2)
Day 6: QUICK Review (Mode 1)
Day 9: MEDIUM Review (Mode 2)
Day 14: MEDIUM Review + Jump (Mode 2 with focus on Technique 5)
Day 21: QUICK Review (Mode 1)
Day 30: FULL MEDIUM Review + total Active Recall (Technique 8)
Day 45: QUICK Review (Mode 1)
Day 60: MEDIUM Review (Mode 2)
Day 90: MEDIUM Review + Jump
Day 120: QUICK Review (Mode 1)
Day 180: MEDIUM Review (Mode 2)
Every 1–2 months: Maintenance (Mode 6)

RULE OF THE MISSED DAY

Did you miss a day? Do not skip. Do the late review on the next available day and follow the schedule normally. DO NOT try to make up for it with doubled reviews. That is tiring and does not lock in more.

HOW TO USE IT WITH SEVERAL PALACES AT THE SAME TIME

  • Write down the Day 0 of each palace in a notebook or app.
  • Every morning, look at which palaces are scheduled for today.
  • Do the ones in Phase 1 first (most critical).
  • Then the ones in Phase 2.
  • Last, the ones in Phase 3 (maintenance).
  • If you have time left over, do an extra QUICK review on the most recent palace.

——–——

PART 7 – EMERGENCY REVIEW (YOU WENT BLANK)

It is going to happen. One day you are going to be in the moment of truth, a test, a presentation, a speech, and you are going to get stuck at a locus. This is the plan to get out of it in seconds.

THE 30-SECOND PROTOCOL

STEP 1 – BREATHE (5 seconds)

3 deep breaths through the nose, releasing slowly through the mouth. Anxiety blocks memory; oxygen unlocks it. This is not stalling, it is biology.

STEP 2 – GO BACK 2 LOCI (5 seconds)

Do not stay stuck at the blocked locus. Mentally go back 2 loci earlier and walk slowly forward again to the point of the blank. 8 out of 10 times the image appears on its own.

STEP 3 – ASK “WHAT COMES NEXT?” (5 seconds)

If going back did not solve it, use association (Technique 9). Ask yourself: “What was AFTER locus X?” Many times the brain pulls the next one, and the forgotten one comes as a bonus.

STEP 4 – JUMP AHEAD (5 seconds)

If it still has not come, JUMP. Continue with the next locus normally. Let the brain work in the background. Come back to the forgotten one at the end.

STEP 5 – VISUAL REINFORCEMENT (10 seconds)

If the forgotten one is critical and needs to come now, close your eyes and REBUILD the locus. See the wall, the floor, the light. The image usually reappears along with the scenery.

WHAT NOT TO DO IN AN EMERGENCY

Do not beat yourself up (“I forgot, I forgot…”). That makes the blank worse.
Do not try to remember “by force.” Go back and walk through it again, always.
Do not abandon the palace and just guess. Trust the system.
Do not stop breathing deeply. Anxiety is the biggest enemy of the palace.

—————

PART 8 – MAINTENANCE REVIEW (LONG-TERM)

Once a palace has gone through Phase 3, it needs very little to stay alive. This part is about how to do that in the most efficient way.

THE 15 MINUTES PER MONTH RULE

1 session of 10 to 15 minutes per month keeps a whole palace solid. Choose a fixed day (e.g., every 1st of the month) and do not skip it. It is little time, but the effect is huge.

MONTHLY SESSION SCRIPT

  1. LINEAR Review of the whole palace, normal pace (5 min).
  2. REVERSE Review, medium pace (3 min).
  3. JUMP Review with 10 random loci (3 min).
  4. Mark the loci where you got stuck. Reinforce only those (2 min).
  5. If it took less than 15 minutes and no errors, next month is guaranteed.

SIGNS THAT THE PALACE IS GETTING WEAK

  • You get stuck on more than 3 loci in the monthly review.
  • The images are “faded” or without color.
  • You swap the order of two or more loci.
  • You remember the locus but forget the image.

IF ANY OF THESE SIGNS APPEAR:

Do a DEEP Review (Mode 3) the next day.
Go back to doing 2 MEDIUM reviews per week for 2 weeks.
Then resume the normal monthly maintenance.

PALACES YOU CAN “RETIRE”

If a palace is about a subject you will no longer need (e.g., material from an old test), you have two options:

  • Retire: stop maintaining it. The palace will fade in a few months.
  • Reuse: erase the old images and use the same loci for other content.

—————

PART 9 – ADAPTATION FOR ANY MIND PALACE

This system works for ANY palace. Here is how to adapt it for the most common cases.

SMALL PALACES (UP TO 10 LOCI)

  • Phase 1 lasts only 2 days instead of 3.
  • Ignore Technique 3 (Blocks). It is not worth it with few loci.
  • Phase 2 can be faster: skip days 6 and 21 if it is easy.
  • Maintenance can be every 2 months instead of every month.

MEDIUM PALACES (10 TO 30 LOCI)

  • Follow the standard system from Part 5, without adjustments.
  • Use blocks of 5 loci in the Deep Review.
  • Monthly maintenance.

LARGE PALACES (30 TO 100 LOCI)

  • ALWAYS divide into blocks of 10 loci (Technique 3).
  • In Phase 1, do one block per session instead of the whole palace.
  • Only do the whole palace at the end of Day 3.
  • In Phase 2, still do the whole palace at each review.

GIANT PALACES (100+ LOCI)

  • Divide into SUB-palaces of 25 to 30 loci.
  • Treat each sub-palace as a medium palace.
  • Once all are solid, do 1 weekly session joining everything.
  • Use a “bridge” image between sub-palaces to never lose the order.

PALACES WITH DENSE INFORMATION

If each locus holds A LOT of information (e.g., a whole paragraph, a large formula), do the following:

  • Divide the content of the locus into 2 or 3 smaller images.
  • Place these images at different points INSIDE the locus (corner, floor, ceiling).
  • In the review, always pull the sub-images in a fixed order.

—————

PART 10 – COMMON MISTAKES AND HOW TO AVOID THEM

ALWAYS REVIEWING IN THE SAME ORDER
This locks in the ROUTE, not the information. You remember the sequence “by heart,” but get stuck when jumping.

Always alternate linear, reverse, and jump.

REVIEWING ONLY BY LOOKING (WITHOUT CLOSING THE MATERIAL)
This is RECOGNIZING, not REMEMBERING. It does not lock anything in.

Close everything. Force the brain to pull (Active Recall).

REVIEWING EVERYTHING SEVERAL TIMES ON THE SAME DAY
It is tiring and locks in little. The brain goes into autopilot.

Space out the reviews. 3 sessions across 3 days > 3 sessions on the same day.

ONLY REVIEWING WHEN “YOU FEEL LIKE YOU FORGOT”
By then it is already too late. Memory has already lost part of it.

Follow the schedule. Review BEFORE forgetting.

INSISTING ON A LOCUS WHERE YOU GOT STUCK
It locks you up even more. It creates anxiety. It ruins the rest of the review.

Go back 2 loci. Or jump ahead. Never stay stuck.

NOT REINFORCING WEAK IMAGES
Pale images fade. An empty locus breaks the route.

Every review, visually reinforce the weak loci.

ABANDONING MAINTENANCE
Months later the palace is gone. And it was all for nothing.

15 minutes per month. It is the price of years of memory.

THINKING “I ALREADY KNOW IT, I DO NOT NEED TO REVIEW”
This is trap number 1. The forgetting curve does not forgive.

If it is easy, great. Even so, review on the scheduled day.

USING LOCI THAT ARE TOO SIMILAR TO EACH OTHER
Two loci with the same type of furniture, same wall, same color. The brain merges the two and you lose the order.

Each locus needs to have something UNIQUE: color, shape, light, texture. If two are similar, exaggerate the difference.

CREATING WEAK, GENERIC, OR “POLITE” IMAGES
An image without emotion is a dead image. An apple sitting still on a table does not lock in anything.

The image needs to be absurd, disgusting, funny, violent, sexual, or ridiculous. The more “inappropriate,” the more the brain records it.

CREATING STATIC IMAGES
A still image is a photo. A moving image is a movie. The brain remembers movies much better.

Every image should have ACTION. Something exploding, falling, spinning, screaming, melting. Movement is glue for memory.

NOT ANCHORING THE IMAGE TO THE LOCUS
The image exists “loose,” floating in the air, without touching anything in the scenery. In the review, it disappears.

The image needs to INTERACT with the locus. Break the furniture, stain the wall, stick to the floor. Without physical contact with the scenery, there is no anchor.

PUTTING TOO MUCH INFORMATION INTO A SINGLE LOCUS
Piling up 5, 6, 7 pieces of information at a single point. It becomes a mess that the brain cannot separate.

A maximum of 2 to 3 images per locus. If you have more, split into extra loci. It is cheaper to create loci than to lose information.

CHANGING THE IMAGE DURING REVIEWS
The first time it was an elephant. The second time it became a hippopotamus. The third time you no longer know what it was.

Defined the image? NEVER change it. The exception is if it is failing repeatedly; then swap it once and restart the cycle for that locus.

CHANGING THE PALACE’S ROUTE AFTER ENCODING
Deciding that the path is better if you enter through the kitchen instead of the living room. After encoding, any change of route destroys the sequence.

The route is defined BEFORE placing any image. After that, it is sacred. It does not change.

NOT RECORDING THE REVIEWS
You do not write down when you reviewed, you do not mark the weak points, you do not know which palace is in which phase.

Have a notebook or spreadsheet. Write down: date, palace, mode used, loci where you got stuck. Without a record, the system becomes guesswork.

THINKING THAT THE IMAGE “REPRESENTS” THE INFORMATION JUST BECAUSE IT MAKES SENSE TO YOU RIGHT NOW
Today the image of a cat seems obvious for remembering “catalysis.” In 30 days, you look at the cat and have no idea why.

The link between image and information needs to be EXPLICIT and strong. Use a similar sound, an action that reminds you of the concept, or a scene that tells the story of the information. If the link depends on “I’ll remember,” you will not.

USING ONLY THE VISUAL SENSE
All the images are only visual. No sound, no smell, no touch, no taste.

The brain records better when multiple senses are activated. Add the NOISE of the explosion, the SMELL of the garbage, the TEXTURE of the object, the TASTE of the blood. More senses = more anchors.

NOT TESTING THE PALACE RIGHT AFTER BUILDING IT
You build 30 loci, close the notebook, and go to sleep. You do not do the first review. The next day, half of it has already faded.

Day 0 exists for a reason. The first IMMEDIATE review after building is the most important of all. Never skip it.

REVIEWING TOO FAST
Rushing through the loci, barely forming the image in your mind, just to “check off” the review.

If the image did not FORM clearly in your head, the review did not count. Speed comes with time. In the beginning, slow and sharp beats fast and blurry.

IGNORING THE JUMP REVIEW BECAUSE YOU THINK IT IS UNNECESSARY
“I already know it in order, why jump?” Because knowing it in order is knowing the ROUTE, not the INFORMATION. In the test, no one asks in order.

If you cannot access locus 17 directly, without going through 1 to 16, you do not know locus 17. Jumping is the real test.

CONFUSING IMAGES FROM DIFFERENT PALACES
You use an elephant in the Biology palace AND in the History palace. When it is time to remember, the brain pulls the wrong one.

Each image needs to be unique in your universe of palaces. Or, if you repeat the element, change the action, color, or context drastically.

NOT SLEEPING PROPERLY
Studying until 3 a.m., building a palace, reviewing at midnight, sleeping 4 hours. And expecting it to work.

Sleep is when memory consolidation happens. Without proper sleep, the palace does not lock in. 7 to 8 hours of sleep do more for your memory than 2 extra hours of review.

USING THE PALACE AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR UNDERSTANDING
Memorizing without understanding. Storing the terms, but not knowing what they mean.

The palace stores INFORMATION, but does not replace UNDERSTANDING. First understand the content. Then encode it. A palace without understanding is a house of cards.

JUMPING STRAIGHT INTO GIANT PALACES WITHOUT EXPERIENCE
You have never built a palace of 10 loci and already want to build one of 200. You get stuck, frustrated, and give up.

Start with 5 to 10 loci. Master the system. Then 20. Then 50. Skill is built, not improvised.

—————

The technique is powerful, but it is not magic. It requires careful building, disciplined review, and constant maintenance.

The mind palace is a TOOL. It works extraordinarily well, but only for those who use it with consistency.

AUTHOR’S NOTE:
In a time increasingly dominated by artificial intelligence, it has become difficult to find someone willing to invest hours of research, effort, and dedication to build something of this magnitude literally with their own hands and words.

This guide was written by me, from scratch. By a person of flesh and blood, with awareness, feelings, mistakes, doubts, and, above all, willingness to research, study, test, and organize all of this in the best way I could.

It would be dishonest to claim that there was absolutely no use of AI during the process. At some moments, I used artificial intelligence tools to get suggestions, ideas, and different perspectives that could contribute to the building of the material. However, it is important to make it clear that AI was not responsible for simply generating the content of this guide. The structure, the organization, the selection of the information, and, above all, the research behind everything were done by me.

A large part of the content was built based on real research, studies, and scientific work, always seeking to understand not only what works, but why it works. Among the references researched are the works of Hermann Ebbinghaus on the forgetting curve, studies related to the SM-2 algorithm, used as a basis by Anki, the classic study by Godden & Baddeley on the influence of context on memory retrieval, research by Dennis Norris, from the University of Cambridge, on chunking and compression of information in short-term verbal memory, among several other works and studies related to memory, learning, and information retention.

Obviously, this guide is not perfect, and I never intended to present it as something infallible or definitive. It is the result of a considerable amount of research, organization, and effort, but it may still contain limitations, points that could be better explained, or information that I simply overlooked.

If, even so, you are not satisfied with the content, that is fine. Feel completely free to express your opinion in the comments. Criticism, corrections, and counterpoints are welcome, especially when accompanied by arguments or sources that can contribute to improving the material.

And that is precisely the goal of this message: contribute to the guide.

If you find any important information that was not covered, know of any relevant study, notice any inconsistency, or simply have a suggestion that could make the material better, leave it in the comments. I will analyze the contributions and, when possible, incorporate them into a future update of the guide.

The idea is that it not be a static material, but something that can keep evolving as new information, research, and contributions come along.

10 Likes
Weak long-term memory
2

Where were you when I had doubts?. This is memory palace stripped showing its working mechanism.

2 Likes
3

Okay, I’ll add a few things. I won’t go into too much detail, as that would require a lot of reformulation, but here it is:

  1. Establish a north (a fixed point in a location). This is the point from which you will begin. It can be from right to left (if you are left-handed) or from left to right (if you are right-handed).

  2. Observe the points as geometric shapes, not pictorial ones. That is, the table loses its color, texture, etc., and becomes a shape that is at a point in the location. For example, in an office, there is a table in the middle with a computer on it and a book in front of the computer.

  3. Group the objects within a location by their angles. This will help you encode the location much faster. I prefer to take a prominent object from each angle and, from there, as if it were a tree, I describe what is at that point.

But in practice, you have to be careful. Your memory can relax and not encode, so I suggest practicing for 20 minutes and then taking a break. For 10 minutes, perform a physical task (not entertainment). Observe a group of 3 to 5 objects for 30 seconds, close your eyes, recover for another 30 seconds, open your eyes, and identify if you made a mistake (this helps with feedback). When identifying errors, be aware if you are forcing your pictorial memory, as it will steal all your attentional resources and you will lose track of objects. This is common at the beginning. Later, it becomes faster to encode environments. If you wonder if you will be confused because nothing has color, the answer is no. If you add color and other details, the responses will compete with each other. That’s why, when encoding mental images, it’s good to have 4 to 6 (it’s easier to form scenes with that number) separated from each other, that is, each scene about a second apart. This is for long-term memory. I’m not talking about competitions, as that’s not my area. My mental palaces are designed for memorizing topics of interest such as mathematics, physics, languages, etc. I need many places.

If you want the articles on these topics, I can send them to you, although some are scientific books about research on sensory memory.

The brain naturally processes spatial locations at 200ms; with training, it can be faster, but you should avoid using the pictorial route, which consumes far more resources than the spatial or “where” route.

4 Likes
4

Muito obrigado! It’s the obvious result of significant labor. I don’t think you need all the information regarding AI and the rest at the end, and very little of the material at the beginning: The substance of the essay is fint without forwards and afterwords, as is frequently the case.

Nevertheless, a fine contribution to our local references.

1 Like
5

I sincerely appreciate your contribution. I intend to wait for additional interactions for some time, as well as to further deepen my studies on the subject, and then republish this guide with updates that are truly relevant and meaningful. In any case, I am very pleased and grateful for your response.

You mentioned that you preferred not to go into many details because it would require a more extensive reformulation; however, if you have the availability in the future, it would be a pleasure to learn about your perspective in greater depth, including, if you prefer, through a direct message.

Once again, thank you very much!

1 Like
6

Haha, I am very happy to hear that! It is truly gratifying to know that the guide is proving useful and that it can contribute, in a concrete way, to the development and growth of others.

1 Like
7

I would genuinely dislike being accused of having conducted the research exclusively with the assistance of AI, to the point that it diminishes or invalidates the recognition for the effort invested. Because of this, I considered this brief explanation necessary, although I recognize that, without it, the presentation would likely feel more fluid and pleasant.

1 Like
8

I’ll go into more detail on just one point, regarding the retention of new places:

Avoid trying to retain places as if they were paintings, like a white wooden chair with red fabric, etc. This will consume your resources very quickly, and you’re not actually memorizing the environment.

But how can I retain the environment properly?

Instead of using “what” language, use “where” language, since the brain stores places and images differently, and is more efficient with places. This is why many practitioners ask: why can’t I notice many details even when the place is very familiar? Well, the brain doesn’t store places the same way it stores images. That is, the brain is only interested in survival, and encoding the environment efficiently is of paramount importance. For example, if there’s a table in the middle of your room or a new room, you’ll know not to go there because you’ll bump into it. The same applies if there’s a rock in a place you’ve already passed.

Now, how do I encode using language? Instead of describing pictorial details, you’ll say, “In the middle, a chair; to the north, a window; to the east, a piece of furniture,” etc.

The brain has a limit of approximately 7 data slots. This means that if you encode objects separately, your brain must maintain each one individually. For example, if you have 20 new objects in a room, such as an armchair, TV, bed, etc., and you don’t group them, your brain will keep replacing one object with another, so you won’t remember all 20. However, if you group 5 objects by angle, you have 4 data slots, so the brain no longer processes 20 objects separately, but rather 4 grouped data slots.

The 20-minute practice session followed by a 10-minute break for a manual task isn’t based on the Pomodoro Technique, but rather on a study that verified this is the most effective way to acquire long-term knowledge. It enhances recall of the material even without the use of mnemonics and traditional spaced repetition. Studying using that method takes about four months for the material to fade, but with mnemonics, it lasts much longer. The 10-minute break is mandatory, but you’re not going to watch TikToks during that time. Instead, you should do a distracting physical activity, like cleaning, modeling clay, etc. This gives the brain the necessary time to strengthen the memory. During this break, the brain will be consolidating the memory, and when you review again, it will be even stronger, since there are three sessions.

Finally, review should not be passive, but active; that is, actively checking what was forgotten and making a quick correction so that the memory is not reinforced with something false or erroneous.

I think that explains it better. This type of research has taken me many hours, but I also know ways to memorize phrases, languages, etc., more efficiently. I was trying to write a book about this, but having too much knowledge and too many ways of doing things, I decided to stop, since it’s very difficult for me to structure everything linearly. I use data structures to organize my images, I memorize places easily, I use 30 ways to create mnemonic images efficiently, I can make difficult concepts easier to memorize, etc. I’ve learned a lot from old mnemonists like Bruno and Fludd (among others), and I’ve improved everything with current neuroscience/psychology. Using neuroscience books has helped me a lot to understand how to encode different types of information efficiently and to structure my own practices for retaining data efficiently. I use Bruno’s techniques to combine concepts or delve deeper into them, although I don’t use them all the time, since these combinations can take hours. Although you gain a good understanding of a topic by viewing it from different angles and perspectives, it is a somewhat awkward method to structure at the beginning.

2 Likes
9

I find it truly impressive to come across someone with such a deep level of knowledge on the subject. Your explanation brought up very interesting points and, honestly, greatly expanded my perspective.

The idea of writing a book seems excellent to me, especially considering the depth and variety of approaches you mentioned. In my case, my main initiative so far has been to study on my own and organize that knowledge in the form of a guide. Even so, perhaps in the future, with more experience and maturity on the subject, I might also consider something along those lines.

Regarding the question of the “7 slots” of memory, I had previously had some superficial contact with this concept, but I had never explored it in depth or verified it rigorously. I found it very interesting that you brought this up, and I will certainly look into it more deeply to better understand its foundations and practical implications. From what I have seen so far, it seems to be related to the classic idea of the limited capacity of working memory, often associated with something around seven units or “chunks,” although more recent studies suggest even smaller values depending on the context.

As I mentioned earlier, my intention is to revisit and update the guide as my understanding evolves, aiming to ensure that any updates truly add value in a consistent way rather than just incrementally.

If it is not a problem, I would like to know whether you would feel comfortable allowing me to contact you privately over time to ask occasional questions or hear your opinion on more specific aspects. I believe this kind of exchange could be extremely enriching.

In addition, if possible, I would be very grateful if you could specifically cite the names of studies or scientific articles that I can find on the internet. I am not referring as much to books, mainly because I do not yet have sufficient fluency in English for continuous reading, which would make the translation process quite laborious. As a last option, of course, that would still be feasible, but only as a last resort. Having more direct references, such as studies or papers, would already help me a great deal in better directing my research.

In any case, I would like to thank you again for your contribution and for your willingness to share this knowledge.

1 Like
10

What language do you speak? And yes, I can answer you, no problem. I used to comment here more, but I’ve stopped doing so recently.

I’ve seen few people talk about this method, although they usually use Pomodoro for different reasons, such as adapting to studying for those who don’t like it at first, but also, when used properly, it can strengthen the memory of what has been studied, only that during the break or rest, stimuli that directly compete with what has been learned, such as audiovisual content, should be avoided.

Check this post: Using Memory Techniques to remember highly condensed material for competitive exams - #117 by Magno

2 Likes
11

I am from Brazil, and my native language is Portuguese. I am writing using AI to translate into English. Personally, I do not trust Google Translate as much as I trust GPT, for example.

Regarding the method you mentioned, I have a question. You described it as something innovative, which may indeed be the case for many people. However, when I was younger and used to look for study methods on YouTube, I had already come across approaches that were quite similar, or even practically identical: the idea of studying for a period, taking a break, and then returning to the material.

For that reason, at first glance, it does not seem to me to be something particularly revolutionary in practical terms. Of course, I understand that the difference may lie in the scientific foundation and in the specific way these intervals are structured. From what I have seen, this type of approach is related to the concept of “spaced learning,” in which intensive study sessions are interspersed with short breaks, often of around ten minutes, as you also suggested, with the goal of promoting long term memory consolidation.

That said, this is not a criticism at all, just a personal perception. In my case, intuitively, it seems to me that investing in improving techniques such as the memory palace may bring a more consistent return, especially in terms of control, organization, and active retrieval of information.

However, I may be underestimating some deeper aspect of this method, especially with regard to its neuroscientific basis or the correct way to apply it. Does my interpretation make sense, or am I overlooking some essential point?

12

It’s not the Pomodoro Technique per se. The method was created based on a scientific study to determine the optimal time for acquiring knowledge more quickly and permanently, enhancing long-term memory of specific study material. However, it has its nuances, as I mentioned, it’s not the Pomodoro Technique.

  1. The optimal time is 20 minutes of study/practice.

  2. 10 minutes of rest, but performing some physical activity (not entertainment such as TV series, movies, social media, etc.).

  3. The material must be consumed or delivered quickly within those 20 minutes, so it should be structured beforehand. Mnemonics work well, but for other types of material, I think it would be more difficult, especially if the material is complex or lacks metaphors, analogies, examples, etc. 4. Every mistake should be given prompt feedback, as the brain reinforces errors in fractions of a second. Therefore, when you make a mistake, you must stop and analyze it.

In my case, I prefer to use metronomes. I also learned this from a study. It works like this: for each beat of the metronome, you create a mnemonic association or visualize pre-established lists.

1 Like
13

Ah, now I understand better what you meant. Your point is quite valid and makes sense. I intend to test the method for some time to evaluate, in practice, how it performs; after that, I will return with more well grounded feedback.

14

This was such an amazing blog. Exactly what I needed, really appreciate it

1 Like
15

You’re welcome! I’m glad to know I was able to help.

1 Like
16

Dude, your answer is way too long; reading it will take longer than reviewing :sweat_smile:

17

A more efficient approach would be to read it carefully once, note the review methods, organize the complete table of review days, and then begin the application process right away.

That said, I would just like to make a respectful observation: your comment gave me the impression of a somewhat rushed attitude, as if the explanation had been dismissed for being too long. I may be misinterpreting this, but I wanted to bring this up because, if the intention is truly to learn and apply it correctly, the content presented already addresses that in a structured way.

In any case, I am saying this in the best possible way, with the intention of helping. Still, whether to use it or not, whether to do it or not, ultimately depends entirely on you.

18

A classic question that I also had at the beginning was whether it was really worth temporarily interrupting what I was already studying, using my own method, in order to learn and develop the use of memory palaces and review systems, and only then return to the original content afterward.

Answering that question: yes, in my view, it is worth it. It is an initial investment of time and effort that may seem like a “cost” in the short term, but one that tends to generate a significantly greater benefit in the long term, both in learning efficiency and in content retention.

1 Like
19

Hi

I am new to these memory training but I want to learn them I am desperate to learn and practice these tools. Can I reach you out personally on any social media handle it will be great help. I am really impressed by your writing and understanding of the topic. I hope you will guide me.

Thanks

1 Like
20

I apologize for the delay in responding. I had some delicate situations to handle recently.

Please feel free to message me here on the forum; there is an option for private messages, and I will be glad to assist you there.

Although I believe there are people who may be more qualified to help you, I remain available and will do my best to contribute in the best way possible.