When I see 83 written then…
6400+480+9 is obvious.
When it is not written down I find myself visualizing the digits 8 and 3 either seperately or as a group.
Now if I calculate with 83 in the center of my view I can almost but not quite see the answer by visualizing the numbers and using my memory for familiar transforms (283) rather than calculating them.
If I calculate 80 * 86 +3^2 which conceptually is a simpler problem I now find it significantly harder to envision the 2 entities with their 2 simple components interacting.
Onto the question?
Is this just a by product of a demented mind.
Is this a point in time effect and will the systems integrate more seamlessly with continued practice.
Is the whole trick to being fast and accurate with mental calculation as simple as reducing the load on the relatively stupid reasoning part of the brain and loading up the visual and memory elements to manipulate abstractions.?
Monkey wants a banana.
It’s curious either way. Memory Sports relies extremely heavily on our brilliant monkey brain.
So, basically you double the distance from 100, and then you add the square of the initial distance
since e.g. for every a<100,
a^2 = 100 * [100 - 2 *(100-a)]+ (100-a)^2
I’d personally find the ( 6600 + 289 ) operation , a bit faster than the
( 80 * 86 + 3^2 ) . But again, it’s a matter of taste. Both methods taste good. But memorizing all the first 100 squares, tastes even better.
For now just learn A LOT of algorithms and find out which ones work best in what circumstances.
A good drill is to do one calculation with all methods you know.
This works well when you work with longer numbers since the second calculation is helped by your memory of the previous numbers.