What if John Von Neumann figured out a few key memorization tricks at an early age?
He could have snowballed those tricks with other tricks, and just heavily practiced these tricks. Mr. Neumann could have outperformed others not due to a raw neurologically monstrous genius, but simple will power and techniques the common human being with similar motivations and desires, would have achieved.
8-digit calculations near instantaneous by age 6?
Could be a Hindu long division trick, but well-practiced: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmiRPHpJUh4
Reading a phone book page a few times and quickly reciting the names, addresses, and phone numbers by age 8?
Could be a mnemonic dictionary of 100 numbers associated with 100 people, 100 objects, and 100 actions, and a mnemonic dictionary of 26 letters associated with 26 people, 26 objects, and 26 actions, allowing for quick storage and retrieval of phone-book-pages of phone numbers, addresses, and names. Albeit, exceptionally well-practiced to the point of championship-level competition.
Sociability and relatability in spite of the neurodivergent obsessiveness typically required to get far in the scientific disciplines he was involved in?
In theory that happens a reasonable amount, but is better explained if he was simply a normal dude he just happened to be well-practiced at a set few techniques that caused him to rise above the mental lot he otherwise would have had.
Spending his whole life focused on data retrieval and storage, and just happening to be exceptional at both memorization-wise?
To me this screams that his work with computers was more-or-less an indirect explanation of mental techniques he may have loosely been engaged in.
At minimum, I think a re-analysis of John Von Neumann from the lens âhe may have been subconsciously using memorization techniques normal people can copyâ is at least worth performing in case we could effectively, copy-paste his memorization methods into our own. Whether on accident or on purpose, his brain had to be somehow storing this information, and chalking it up to merely âhe was a geniusâ or âhis brain was just wired better for itâ to me brushes off reality for folktale-tier borderline lazy explanations of things we do not fully understand.
Thoughts?

