I have a sense that I am going to become a bit of a pain in the ass.
Migrating data from Systems to Memosets and just realized.
Groups. doh!
Just a short list of memo sets I have thought that I could work into to:
Being able to order and.or tag memosets probably also nice.
| Memoset | cards | |
|---|---|---|
| My Major System | 100 | |
| 120 Squares | 120 | |
| Exponents | 3 | |
| Logarithms | 3 | |
| Euclid | 3 | |
| Cards - Bicycle (52 Cards) | 3 | |
| Cards - Thoth (78 Cards) | 3 | |
| Constellations | 85 | |
| Zodiac | 13 |
The new version of the software (not yet released) does include groups in memo sets.
In the meantime, you could just add a column called Group and get mostly the same result.
In some cases, it will make sense to use additional columns instead of groups when converting a system to a memo set. For example, if you have a PAO system with one group for Person, another for Action, and another for Object, it would make sense to have columns for those in a memo set so you could see everything together.
Where groups is nice is when you want to test directly against a few different dimensions selectively
a => b
b => a
image for b => image for a
a => image for b
groups allows for nice variation and lets you to practice in both(or multiple) directions.