Well, since voting day has been delayed a bit, I am fortunate to have a bit more time to answer in greater details Francis’ other questions:
My “pro-democracy campaign” is always on. Rules do matter in a democracy. Based on what you were telling me at the time in that email, I did not see a reason why Braden should be excluded from the rules. I felt as if you were taunting me, as if you guys were breaking the rules again and were getting away with it! After my discussion with Guillaume of the Election Committee, I realized that what you had told me wasn’t completely accurate either and so I withdrew my complaint while critizing the inaccurate incomplete information that I had received. As far as who I will vote for, I think that my vote will go to you Francis since you are a fan of mine as you want to buy me a beer and maybe for Braden as well since you like to work with him.
Since you had stated previously that you were unwilling to work with me on a board again, I figured my presence on the IAM Board would be good enough to keep you from joining. I guess I was wrong. What happened? Both of you forgot how bad it is discussing issues with me on a Board?
I am skeptical of your claim that you or Braden would be willing to work again with me: I remember the last time you considered that idea. I was trying to make a deal with you as I was not happy with the outcome of the situation that we were in, with you and Braden going your own way to start a new board. I had offered you to organize the upcoming 2017 Canadian Memory Championship at your complete discretion, without interference from me. After some thoughts and deliberations, you rejected that offer and instead offered me to work on your board in the form of an official advisory capacity but that no, I would not be on your board itself because you and Braden remembered how it was with me there and you didn’t want to go through that again.
So, I am glad to hear your words here. Either you have forgotten how it is with me on the Board of the Canadian Memory Championship or you are not telling the whole truth here. What are the humiliating conditions I would be required to accept in order for you and Braden to want to work with me again?
Right now, you try and sound like a peace maker because this will make you look good in front of the members and may help your chances of receiving their votes. Therefore I would ask people reading his friendly words to me here to be skeptical of his kind offer. I think it is meant to score points with you. I have things to say but I don’t say them becsuse he warned you to be skeptical with me and so you might not believe what I would say. But if you are going to make an honest kind offer of reconciliation to someone, will you, in the same message, tell everyone to be skeptical about what “he” has to say, as if you had heard me say something that make you skeptical of me (a joke?) and that others need to be warned about me as well? You merge your reconciliation offer with another insult. It is not sincere.
If you think someone is much deceitful, isn’t it best not to try to be their friend? Francis talks as if I had started some sort of adversity with him but I started the Canadian Memory Championships in 2012, and he would… no I can’t go into that because you have been warned to be skeptical and I think this is unbelievable. To me, this post from Francis to which I am relying and which includes good wishes for me is just more unbelievable propaganda from him. Please read it with the same degree of skepticism that he recommends that you read my words.
Have a great day everyone. Democracy gets stronger as more people vote and weaker when people lose interest, so please make sure to vote tomorrow. Thank you!